.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Executives From Obama's Bankrupt Solyndra Will Plead The Fifth In Congressional Hearing

Barack Obama

Reuters is reporting today that executives of the newly bankrupt solar company, Solyndra, who President Obama fully backed, attended their corporate meetings and gave $500,000,000 in taxpayer money the country will never see again, will plead the fifth in Congressional hearings, invoking the Constitution, to prevent self-incrimination. This lends the appearance of guilt on their part and the taxpayers deserve a better explanation, rather than none at all via a cop out.

RELATED ARTICLES

Government Gullibility: Played For Suckers Or Was Solyndra A Front For Something Else

Obama Administration Mum On How Many Jobs They Can Create For $420 Billion In Taxpayer Money

Obama Solar Firm Fails Filing For Bankruptcy And Laying Off 1,110 People

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Is Anti-Obama Merchandising Covered By The Constitution

Are Democrats Violating The Constitution In Having Them Removed From Stores

Obama mints

Democrats have been busy having anti-Obama merchandising removed from stores and complaining about their sale online, as disrespectful to the President of the United States of America. For example, angry Democrats had breath mints styled after Obama, called "Disappoint-mints" removed from stores, for subtly calling the president a disappointment.

Obama t-shirts

A number of anti-Obama t-shirts have been selling online as well, which poke fun at the president. Some shirts label him a spendthrift, while others flat out call him a socialist. The question is are Democrats correct in having anti-Obama merchandising removed from outlet. The answer is no, as it is protected by the Constitution, under free speech and does not threaten the President. The only thing it threatens is his reelection campaign.

RELATED ARTICLES

Polls Currently Reveal Obama Will Not Be Reelected

Gallup Poll: Any Republican Would Beat Obama If The Presidential Election Was Held Today

Obama's Poll Numbers Implode Into Disaster

When It Comes To Debt The Obama Administration Has The Mindset Of Gamblers

Rivals Use Bad Economy As Primary Tool In Their Bid To Oust President Obama

Billionaire Tells Obama To Resign Over The Economy

America's National Deficit Increased An Unprecedented 35% Under President Obama

A Majority Of Americans Feel They Were Better Off Before President Obama

Officials Officially Pronounce Obama's Stimulus A Massive Failure That Added Billions To The National Debt

New Negative Jobs Report Is Bad News For Obama

The Benefits Of Government Cost Cutting

Obama Calls For Job Summit

Artificial Growth - Part 2

Artificial Growth

Friday, July 1, 2011

Mark Halperin Calling Obama A "Di*k" On Television Revealed The Limits On Free Speech

Barack Obama's office made a call to MSNBC about Mark Halperin, who was suspended shortly after

Yesterday, Time magazine editor and television political pundit, Mark Halperin, called U.S. President, Barack Obama, a "di*k" on national television. MSNBC suspended him, after receiving a call from President Obama's representative at the White House, complaining about the comment that made it onto the air, due to a MSNBC technician pressing the wrong button in the control booth (smooth). Halperin is being punished for exercising his right to free speech, revealing the limits being placed on the Constitution.

President Obama's office did what he instructed them to, as he does not take criticism well. Obama has even employed an individual on the taxpayers' dime, Jesse Lee, to argue with people on Twitter, when they write unflattering stories about him. Journalists and bloggers have publicly complained of President Obama, having blogs and other websites, penalized or shutdown for writing unflattering pieces about him.

Mark Halperin: Uh oh!

Many have rightly labeled this conduct censorship and a violation of free speech, as prescribed by the Constitution. The Judiciary Report has experienced this firsthand and can attest, the President is actively trying to shape his press via censorship, by pulling strings at companies such as Google, to punish those that freely publish the truth.

Under the law, it is the President's job to, "Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" - not impede, thwart, violate or destroy it out of self-interest, when one does not like what is being said or written.

RELATED ARTICLE

Mark Halperin Calls President Obama A Di*k On Television

STORY SOURCE

Carney called Halperin's bosses

Updated: 06/30/11 4:44 PM - White House press secretary Jay Carney announced Thursday that he called Mark Halperin's bosses at MSNBC after the network contributor called President Obama "a dick" on a morning show.

"The comment that was made was inappropriate," Carney told reporters in his daily briefing. "It would be inappropriate to say that about either president of either party."...He told reporters that "on behalf of the White House, I expressed that sentiment to executives at the network."

http://www.politico.com

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Mainstream Newspapers Finally Realize The FBI Has Become A Law Unto Itself

Barack Obama is presiding over a massive power grab that defies the U.S. Constitution

Mainstream newspapers such as the New York Times and the New Jersey Star Ledger, have slammed the FBI's new investigative rules, as unconstitutional and lacking oversight. The FBI has so changed its guidelines for agents investigating individuals and organizations, they have eliminated the need to file paperwork, which means there will be no paper trial, thus foiling every Freedom of Information Act request filed by anyone.

As the Judiciary Report first revealed, the FBI has a Secret File Room, where the agency hides files, such as those containing terrible wrongdoing they committed, but the maneuvering has become so complicated, they seek to eliminate the need to do so once and for all, lest a terrible file accidentally gets misfiled. They are going to provoke hackers into raiding their files, if the FOIA treachery, secrecy and defiance, continues on its current path.

The FBI has gotten tired of answering to the press and public and want it stopped, as they believe themselves above the law. It was an extraordinary step to take, in a terrible leap towards a full fledged, undemocratic police state. FBI employees are about to become some of the most powerful people in America and inappropriately so.

They will be able to secretly investigate the President, Vice President, members of Congress, the aforementioned people's family members and significant others, not to mention, everyday Americans, with absolutely no probable cause, oversight or record of any kind. That is chillingly perverse and screams totalitarianism. To grant a secretive, law flouting investigative agency of 30,000 people, absolute power and no accountability in prying into others lives, with the ability to bring criminal cases, is begging for calamity to strike.

U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder and FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller

The FBI has repeatedly been cited over the past several years, in Congress and by the Justice Department's Inspector General, for abuses of congressionally invested authority, as they used the agency's resources to inappropriately spy on girlfriends, wives, objects of their affection, rivals, politicians, scientists, doctors, entertainers, journalists and bloggers. FBI agents have been imprisoned for accepting cash and or sexual bribes, in exchange for privileged agency information, due to the paper trial that used to exist.

Under the new rules, if FBI agents choose to secretly moonlight and accept large sums of money, for improperly investigating people without cause and passing on the information for payment to the highest bidder, they will be able to do so without penalty or any paper trail. Considering FBI agents have betrayed America in the not so distant past, in well documented cases, selling national secrets to the nation's enemies, it is going to be a free for all with the agency's new rules that have removed oversight. They think they're slick.

Agents will have full access to the agency's investigative tools, such as your telephone wiretap transcripts, emails, computer contents with the FBI's CIPAV trojan, web cam images and videos, conversations in your home and office, bank account statements, video surveillance recordings of your home and GPS data from your phone and vehicle.

Almost as bad is the Obama Administration and Congress letting the FBI do this. But don't worry, when this breed of unaccountable surveillance burns some high ranking politicians in Washington, with domestic and foreign rivals finding out all their deepest personal and political secrets, at the hands of FBI agents supplementing their incomes, they'll know it was a bad idea.

The FBI has now effectively managed to completely trample the U.S. Constitution and this time, without fear of any legal consequences. For additional information on the aforementioned, please read the external links below from notable newspapers.

STORY SOURCE

Backward at the FBI

FBI is overreaching with rules changes

Killing Democracy One File at a Time: Justice Department Loosens FBI Domestic Spy Guidelines

RELATED ARTICLES

The FBI's Secret Spying Is Unnerving The Public

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Leading Rental Company Facing Lawsuit For Spying On People In Their Homes Through Their Laptops

Computer Technician Secretly Spied On Customers In Their Homes While They Were Naked

How To Protect Yourself From Being Spied On In Your Home Through Your Webcam Or Mobile Phone

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Obama's Attempts To Reinstall FBI Director Deemed Unconstitutional


Barack Obama is running from the law on Mueller

According to constitutional scholars, U.S. President Barack Obama's attempt at extending the term of failure prone, FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller, is unconstitutional. As many writers have publicly expressed, for President Obama to dubiously assert he has been unable to find a suitable replacement for Mueller over the past 2 and a 1/2 years, is questionable and highly unlikely.

It is also an insult to America, as there are many qualified men and women in the nation, who could adequately fill the post and more importantly, bring some measure of justice, fairness, oversight and stability to the FBI, which it sorely lacks.

Robert S. Mueller

Mueller has the disgraceful distinction of being sued more times than any other FBI Director in U.S. history and it is due to his corrupt ways, racist beliefs, retaliatory conduct and acts of sheer treachery, when it comes to the rights and privacy of innocent people.

However, President Obama has a special arrangement with Mueller, who introduced him to a terrible breed of unconstitutional spying, as seen during the Bush Administration. Obama does not want to give up the unconstitutional and invasive investigative reports Mueller has been conducting against innocent people, as favors to the president, select politicians in Congress and wealthy individuals in the corporate sector and that is at the heart of the issue, in challenging established law regarding term limits, in such an extraordinary fashion.

RELATED ARTICLES

Bill O'Reilly Takes The FBI To Task Over Weiner

The FBI Busted Hiding Evidence

Why Did The FBI Let A Notorious Terrorist Go?

FBI Supervisors To FBI Director: We Want You Gone

STORY SOURCE

Might Giving Mueller Two More Years as FBI Head Be . . . Unconstitutional?

June 9, 2011, 1:28 PM ET - ...But while we’ve heard nary a peep from political partisans, we’re starting to hear wait-a-minutes from those who know more about the U.S. Constitution than yes, even your average senator or House member.

On Wednesday morning, as Politico reporter Josh Gerstein noted in this piece, UVA law professor John Harrison testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that the legislation endorsed by the White House to extend Mueller’s term might be constitutionally flawed. The reason: it would effectively allow Congress the power to install Mueller into the seat, a power reserved for the president by the constitution’s appointments clause.

“A statute like S. 1103 would, in a situation in which an office otherwise would be vacant, cause a particular individual through a legal act of Congress to hold that office . . . that is an appointment and that is something that Congress cannot do, that has to be done through the appointments clause.”...

http://blogs.wsj.com/law

Earn Money With Your Website
Earn Money With Your Website