Thief Steals Song Notebook And Guitar From The Home Of Deceased Singer Amy Winehouse

Amy Winehouse

Talk about grave robbers. The family of the late singer Amy Winehouse, is reporting someone stole her song notebook and guitar from her Camden home, after her death. The notebook contained unreleased song in the form of lyrics, which are quite valuable.

Only an industry person could truly benefit from such a theft, because why would a real fan steal something of that order to keep it to themself. The songbook would be useful to someone in the entertainment world, whether it be a writer, producer, label executive or singer pretending to be a songwriter - and the industry is full of such frauds, who would pay cut-rate prices to criminals, to get their greedy hands on other people's copyrights, via commissioned burglaries, among other things. Winehouse's family need to secure her computer as well.

RELATED ARTICLES

Amy Winehouse's Funeral Held In London

Amy Winehouse Died In Bed

Singer Amy Winehouse Found Dead At Age 27

Senator Demands FBI Investigate Rupert Murdoch For Hacking Rival And Stealing The Contents Of Their Business Computers

Rupert Murdoch

In 2005, U.S. Senator, Frank Lautenberg, privately wrote to the FBI, in his official capacity as a lawmaker, referring a computer intrusion, copyright infringement and trade secret theft case, regarding a company in New Jersey called, Floorgraphics, which was hacked by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.

The FBI looked the other way to the complaint and crimes being committed, due to bribery and their belief that major corporations can commit any crime they want with impunity. It has been confirmed in London that News International/News Corp bribed officers in the Metropolitan Police. They were not the only ones, as the FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller, took a bribe as well.

News Corp criminally broke into Floorgraphics' computer systems to steal. They hacked, then copied the entire contents of Floorgraphics' business computers and used the propriety, copyrighted data contained therein for financial gain in commerce.

After stealing the company's copyrighted products and databases via hacking, News Corp, then went about destroying Floorgraphics, via a smear campaign, which included maligning the company's executives to the public, destroying its business equipment and paying and in some cases, threatening people and companies not to do business with them. In short, News Corp had arrogantly stolen the smaller company's business products and data and now wanted them gone.

In 2009, Floorgraphics, went public with the story, via suing News Corp, as the FBI had looked the other way to the felonious crimes being committed against the company, which in itself, constitutes felonies by the law enforcement agency. The civil case, that should have been a criminal filing, was rocky, settled for less than it should have been, reopened, then declined by sitting judge, also known as corruption.

This month, U.S. Senator Lautenberg, this time made public a second letter he has written to the FBI and DOJ, demanding they reopen the Floorgraphics case. It remains to be seen if the FBI/DOJ will or continue down the corrupt path they've tread for years, to the public's detriment.

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

The aforementioned story should sound very familiar to my readers, as it is the exact same thing that happened to me, due to Madonna and News Corp, criminally hacking my computers, which I reported to the FBI in 2005.

I also filed a complaint with the Metropolitan Police in October 2005 (formal complaint), who took the information and did actually make two arrests six months later. However, in October 2005, the Met Police said due to the fact I am on U.S. shores, my case is in the FBI's jurisdiction, but don't hold my breath, because the FBI is not very good with these cases and the sum of money involved in the case would be a factor.

Two weeks later in November 2005, the FBI told me they would investigate, but along the way, took a bribe, as told to me by the source of many of my exclusives that have later proven true. Sadly, the Metropolitan Police is now on the hot seat for taking bribes in the same News International/News Corp case, as revealed in the mainstream British press. I do give them credit that they did at least make some arrests, though they could have done more, but as a person of British lineage, I am disappointed that they let criminals like Murdoch and Madonna destroy their name. It could not have been worth it.

In 2009, I sued under the Freedom of Information Act (The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case) to obtain the results of the FBI's investigation and any other files being kept regarding me, but the judge in the case, Jose E. Martinez, who used to work for the FBI's parent agency, the DOJ, corruptly granted the FBI "sovereign immunity" which is a fancy way of saying a nation's government can commit any crimes it wants to against citizens and be allowed this despicable privilege, as it is sovereign. When federal judges issue such corrupt rulings, the government should embrace the fact it has lost all credibility in the world and should stop lecturing domestic citizens and foreign governments on how to behave and follow the law.

Even if the FBI/DOJ did not want to pay damages, which under the law they are supposed to, due to the lasting damage (I became deathly ill with a brain hemorrhage from being harassed and terrorized) and massive loss (a fortune in copyrights stolen) their unlawful conduct facilitated, during Obama's so-called era of transparency, why didn't they release the legally requested files under the Freedom of Information Act.

The law says they are supposed to but they did not. Why hide the FOIA files, which they admitted in writing exist, but repeatedly refused to release. What are they hiding (rhetorical). You call that transparency? I call that blatant hypocrisy, lawbreaking, bribery and obstruction of justice. The contents of the files show the crimes Madonna, News Corp and ironically, the FBI committed, via aiding and abetting criminals.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Even the scum bucket assistant U.S. attorney they assigned the case in Miami, nastily informed in a written motion that the U.S. Civil Rights Act did not give black people equal rights under the law in America and thus the FBI did not violate it by discriminating against me in the case in not bringing justice. That's the kind of arrogance and evil emanating from Obama's FBI/DOJ.

The most ironic part of their misconduct is the FBI/DOJ and assistant U.S. Attorney in Miami, being smug and cocky about their conduct in legal filings, because they basically own the judge, yet it ended up costing Obama and his fellow Democrats votes in the 2010 election. I wrote many articles online, decrying their conduct, in the lead up to the 2010 election that reached millions of voters. People got to witness the case being filed and corrupted by Obama's FBI/DOJ, who had promised to run a clean organization, but as the case showed, did not. Looking forward to the 2012 election.

When you corruptly and deliberately look the other way to cases such as mine and that of Floorgraphics (and I know there are more) you send the nation and the world the unforgettable message the government is illegally aiding and abetting large corporations in stealing the hard earned property and proprietary assets of smaller companies, which in essence, is criminally nationalizing people's property, as America is supposed to be a democracy. Nationalizing hardworking citizens' property against their will is only legal in socialist and communists governments. You think about that, while you do your level best to ignore the Constitution.

As I see it, I warned you in writing and during the two interviews at the FBI's office in Miami, that Madonna/Kabbalah and her cronies at News Corp, were violating people through illegal wiretapping, hacking and corporate theft, among other things, but you looked the other way, to the point many other innocent people, among them children, were violated by this invasive form of spying.

None of you deserve to be in office, as you failed the people across the board, due to bribery and campaign donations. In 2012, you deserve to lose by a landslide, because you knew of the crimes and abuses and looked the other way.

RELATED ARTICLES

News Corp And Insider Trading In The Phone Hacking Scandal

Australian Prime Minister Slams Rupert Murdoch And News Corp

A Second News Corp Whistleblower Died

Delusional Rupert Murdoch Thinks The Public Adores Him

The Head Of The Wall Street Journal Resigns Due To Rupert Murdoch Phone Hacking Scandal

Privacy Invader Rebekah Brooks Resigns From Rupert Murdoch's News Company

The FBI To Investigate Rupert Murdoch's News Corp

Rupert Murdoch Executive Admitted To Bribing The Metropolitan Police (Video)

Rupert Murdoch Illegally Accessed The Medical Records Of The Prime Minister's Sick Child

Report: Rupert Murdoch To Relaunch News Of The World As The Sun On Sunday

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp In Trouble As More Employees Are Arrested And News Of The World Closes

Rebekah Brooks Played Sex Games In The Office With Rupert Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch Finally Admits His Company's Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Crimes

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Madonna's Connection To Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal

STORY SOURCE

Senator asks to revisit '05 News Corp claim

US senator invokes website-hacking trial in call for Murdoch inquiry

Lawsuit claims News Corp. tried to destroy rival

Rupert Murdoch's Other Hacking Scandal

Delusional Rupert Murdoch Thinks The Public Adores Him

Crowd protesting outside Murdoch's New York home calling him a racist

Delusional mogul, Rupert Murdoch, is under the misguided impression the public loves him and the illegal phone hacking and wiretapping scandal he is currently mired in, is simply an inconsequential formality and side effect of ruthlessly doing business in a modern world (in a dirty manner, might I add).

This week, the three main political parties in Britain united to crush his bid for more media control in the United Kingdom, denouncing him to the watching world. People also gathered outside his home in New York, protesting his criminal conduct in the aforementioned scandal and lack of ethics in race matters.

Yet Murdoch, experiencing some sort of disconnect, believes everything is fine and his company's credibility is intact. Murdoch stated yesterday in his newspaper, the Wall Street Journal, "We think it's important to absolutely establish our integrity in the eyes of the public...I felt that it's best just to be as transparent as possible."

What planet are you living on that you are so oblivious to the obvious. Members of the public are calling for your imprisonment and demanding your media companies vacate their shores. That's not a compliment.

I am in agreement with members of the public slamming your use of race to slur, exploit and divide people. I've seen you do it firsthand and I think you are a full-fledged racist, whose mindset is stranded in colonial times.

Rupert Murdoch

You've invaded my privacy for financial gain, with members of your staff lifting items from my private emails, text messages and protected, preexisting copyrights, for financial gain. You are one of the greediest, most wicked, unscrupulous businesspeople on the planet.

I've seen items from my private emails and text, sent by me, to my email box as "Poor Man's Copyrights" to provide quick time stamps in the event of theft (before my Library of Congress copyrights are filed) brazenly end up in your papers as scoops and exclusives.

My private email and text time stamps, compared against later verbatim copying by your company's newspapers, such as the Sun, News of the World, the New York Post and Wall Street Journal, testifies to the criminal misconduct on your part.

I've seen items from my preexisting Library of Congress copyrights, end up at your companies Fox (copyright infringing songs and videos by "American Idol" artists), 20th Century Fox ("My Super Ex-Girlfriend" and "I Am Number Four" to name a few) and at your daughter Elisabeth Murdoch's production company Shine (her rip-off BBC show "Demons").

Rupert Murdoch and family

You are an arrogant, racist, despicable family of thieves, whose greed knows no limits. You want everything, but do not want to work for it. Not content with the significant amount you already have, you want what belongs to everyone else as well and will stoop to any low to get it.

And to top it all off, as if the stealing and exploitation were not enough, you had the gall to defame me in 2005 (willful malice), after I went to the Met Police reporting your crimes against me (formal complaint), which led to arrests of your employees, in conduct you've since publicly admitted is true (Rupert Murdoch Finally Admits His Company's Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Crimes).

Am I supposed to be happy with all this deplorable, insidious conduct from you and yours. You consistently do foul things to people and then expect them to applaud and praise you for it. Like the public is supposed to appreciate the abuse.

Note to the Murdochs: The sun, pardon the pun, does not shine out of your backsides. When you do vile, vicious things to people, don't be surprise when they publicly bring you down for it. Legally speaking, this is far from over.

RELATED ARTICLES

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp In Trouble As More Employees Are Arrested And News Of The World Closes

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Rupert Murdoch Hypocritically Launches Whistleblower Site

Rupert Murdoch Finally Admits His Company's Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Crimes

Madonna's Connection To Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Rupert Murdoch Compromised National Security With Illegal Phone Hacking And Wiretapping

iPhone Tracking Scandal Gives Insight To Rupert Murdoch Phone Hacking And Wiretapping

Rupert Murdoch Has Proven He Cannot Be Trusted

Another Rupert Murdoch Journalist Arrested For Wiretapping And Hacking

Has Rupert Murdoch Ever Spied On A World Government For Another

Report: Rupert Murdoch Blackmailed The British Prime Minister

Mr. Murdoch, Your Viagra Prescription Is Ready

London Mayor Urges Newspapers To Come Forward In Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal

Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal Runs Way Deeper Than They Are Admitting

Newsweek Outs Madonna As The Criminal Behind Kabbalah

Confirmed: Kabbalah Is Under Criminal Investigation

Rihanna Sued Again For Stealing

Lewd singer Rihanna grabbing her crotch in concert in front of kids and adults alike

Frequently sued Kabbalah singer, Rihanna, is in trouble again. She is facing another lawsuit over the lewd, soft-core porn music video "S&M" for stealing copyrighted items from photographer, Phillip Paulus. Previously, famous photographer, David LaChappelle, sued Rihanna for stealing his preexisting copyrighted work, for illegal use in the music video.

Rihanna has made a career out of copyright infringement, stealing from a number of singers and writers as well. She is a complete fraud and thief. To steal someone's copyrights is to steal their property, making one no better than a common criminal.

STORY SOURCE

Rihanna Facing Another S & M Lawsuit From Second Photographer – Accused Of Stealing Ideas

RELATED ARTICLES

Rihanna Sued Over Video Theft

Rihanna Stole New Video From Photographer

Rihanna CD Bombing Again

Unwise Rihanna Slams Blogs, Bloggers And Readers

Rihanna Embarrasses Herself On Twitter By Falsely Claiming Concert Is Sold Out

Rihanna Arena Tour To Be Scrapped Due To Poor Sales

Rihanna Drops Restraining Order Against Chris Brown

Mike Tyson Not First Athlete Involved In Tattoo Copyright Case

All of the drama being played out the past few weeks regarding a copyright infringement case against  the replicated Mike Tyson tribal tattoo the new film "The Hangover 2" by the tattoo artist has a couple of precedents involving sports stars and their tattoos to base the case on.

In 2005, Rasheed Wallace and Nike were sued by tattoo artist Matthew Reed for featuring Reed's ink work in a commercial.  The artist claimed the Egyptian-style tattoo on the basketball star's right shoulder was his artwork and sued the shoe company for copyright infringement.

"If you are going to make money from it [a tattoo], you should get the artist's permission," Reed claimed.

The case was later settled.

London-based tattoo artist Louis Malloy, and former friend of David Beckham, sued the soccer star for exploiting his needle work in an advertising campaign.  The artist, who inked nine of Beckham's tats, wanted a percentage the ad campaign which featured Beckham's body and his tattoos prominently.  Malloy claimed the artwork was his creation and said copyright royalties were due his way.

The Daily Mirror in London even ran a tabloid headline which quoted Malloy, "I own Beck's Tattoo...and I'll Sue." He's still suing.

Tyson isn't being held responsible by Victor Whitmill--the former Las Vegas tattoo artist who did the tribal markings on the former-boxer's face.  Whitmill has gone before a judge in St. Louis to block Warner Brothers Entertainment from releasing HO2.  It doesn't look like Whitmill's frivolous suit has much merit and he should be thankful for the free publicity he is receiving get back to labeling women with tramp stamps.

The whole episode raises a lot of copyright questions like what if somebody gets a copy of a hanging Andy Warhol painting or the Rolling Stones' iconic "lips and tongue" logo (must be a million of those out there) tattooed on their body, is it stealing or copyright infringement?  Who does own the body art?

In layman's terms, the U.S. Copyright Law: Title 17 says unless there is a written contract otherwise, the person who paid for the tattoo is the owner of said tattoo.

So expect HO2 to be in theaters this weekend and Beckham to continue his quest to cover his body with more tats than Michael Scofield (his hero), the tattooed character from the cancelled TV series "Prison Break."