Judge Orders One Of Rupert Murdoch's Hackers To Disclose All Evidence

Ordered To Name Names

Wow, I can see through his hairline (much like his case). All that illegally made money and he can't buy some good hair dye.

A British judge has ordered one of Rupert Murdoch's hackers, Glenn Mulcaire, who worked for his company News International/News Corp, to disclose the names of the people he has hacked. Actor Steve Coogan won the ruling in a phone hacking case filed against Mulcaire and News Corp.

It should be noted, Murdoch paid Mulcaire's legal fees, in excess of $400,000. However, with the current controversy taking aim at the Murdoch family, they stopped paying his legal fees, prompting Mulcaire to file suit in British Court.

James Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch and Elisabeth Murdoch

Mulcaire didn't take the initiative, hire himself at News International/News Corp, then wiretap and hack scores of politicians, celebrities and victims of crime, out of the goodness of his heart. He did it because he was paid and instructed to do so, in orders that came straight from the top.

News International/News Corp already publicly admitted their tip lines produce very few scoops and most people in the know will not talk to them for fear their names will be broadcast all over the news and in the press, to lend credibility to newspaper stories, even after demanding to remain anonymous.

Glenn Mulcaire

Think about it, if you owned newspapers and kept reading incendiary exclusive after incendiary exclusive in your publications, telling the public secrets of what goes on in the privacy of people's homes, on their private phone lines and in their personal medial records, wouldn't you question how your staff was constantly coming up with this invasive information. Well, no you wouldn't question it if you'd paid and told them to get the information illegally, as the Murdoch's have done.

So, unless you are like Joseph in the Bible, having dreams telling you the future and what is going on behind closed doors, it's safe to assume you are illegally hacking and wiretapping people for information to financially profit from.

RELATED ARTICLES

Renewed Outrage In Britain Over Rupert Murdoch's News Corp Phone Hacking Mom Of Murdered Missing Girl

Fox News Has A Secret Phone Hacking Department In The Building Says Former Employee

Prominent Editor Accuses News Corp Of Stalking And Bullying People

Senator Demands FBI Investigate Rupert Murdoch For Hacking Rival & Stealing Their Copyrights

News Corp Employees State James Murdoch Lied In Parliament About The Phone Hacking Scandal

Rupert Murdoch Illegally Accessed The Medical Records Of The Prime Minister's Sick Child

The Head Of The Wall Street Journal Resigns Due To Rupert Murdoch Phone Hacking Scandal

Privacy Invader Rebekah Brooks Resigns From Rupert Murdoch's News Company

Rupert Murdoch Executive Admitted To Bribing The Metropolitan Police (Video)

News Corp And Insider Trading In The Phone Hacking Scandal

Australian Prime Minister Slams Rupert Murdoch And News Corp

Delusional Rupert Murdoch Thinks The Public Adores Him

Rupert Murdoch Finally Admits His Company's Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Crimes

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Madonna's Connection To Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal

A Second News Corp Whistleblower Died

Photographer's Theft Lawsuit Against Rihanna Will Proceed

Rihanna groping herself on stage

The copyright infringement lawsuit, filed by famed photographer, Dave LaChapelle, against thieving singer, Rihanna, will proceed, as Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, has refused to dismiss it. A motion to dismiss was put in, per her lawyer's request. The lawsuit centers on Rihanna's habit of chronically stealing other people's copyrights for use in her fraudulent career, which has resulted in the aforementioned legal filing.

Copyright infringement is a federal and international crime and it is pathetic that Rihanna and others like her, such as Beyonce and Madonna, have based their entire careers on this disgraceful conduct. It says they should not be famous, as their entire careers are a lie. It speaks to how poorly they were raised, as to steal copyrights, is to steal other people's property and money.

STORY SOURCE

David LaChapelle Wins Pre-Trial Ruling Against Rihanna‎

RELATED ARTICLES

Rihanna Sued Over Video Theft

Rihanna Stole New Video From Photographer

Rihanna Sued Again For Stealing

Rihanna CD Bombing Again

Unwise Rihanna Slams Blogs, Bloggers And Readers

Rihanna Embarrasses Herself On Twitter By Falsely Claiming Concert Is Sold Out

Rihanna Arena Tour To Be Scrapped Due To Poor Sales

Rihanna Drops Restraining Order Against Chris Brown

Judge Wipes Smirk Of Casey Anthony's Smug Face At Sentencing

Casey Anthony, smirking whilst talking to her lawyer, Dorothy Clay Sims, believing she would go free today

Once again, Casey Anthony appeared in court inappropriately grinning, after being acquitted of the murder of her 2-year-old toddler, Caylee Anthony. However, the smirk was short lived, as she was told she would not be released until next Wednesday, July 13, 2011, when she expected to go free today.

Casey Anthony grinning in court two days ago at the not guilty verdict

Curiously, in court today, gone was Anthony's formal, matronly clothes she had worn throughout the trial, replaced by flowing hair she was twirling around her fingers, lip gloss, eye liner, mascara and a form fitting ensemble. Anthony looked like she was ready to go to a party - you know, like she immediately did when her little daughter she knew was dead, went missing, then didn't report it to the police for an entire month.

Caylee Anthony

With most people, if their kids are missing for even a few minutes, they will call the police. To reiterate, Anthony waited an entire month, finally caving in to pressure from her mom, Cindy Anthony, to report Caylee missing. Another item of alarm that qualifies as a smoking gun is, before her daughter died, Anthony did internet searches on how to break a person's neck. This in tandem with other evidence found in Anthony's car, such as strands of Caylee's hair, duct tape, the presence of chloroform and DNA belonging to a decomposing human body in her trunk (boot), doesn't paint a pretty or innocent picture.

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Is Casey Anthony Smiling In Court

Casey Anthony Acquitted Of Murdering Her Toddler Sparks Outrage On The Internet

Michael Douglas' Ex-Wife Loses Legal Battle For Wall Street Money

Michael Douglas

Diandra Douglas, the ex-wife of actor Michael Douglas, has lost a protracted legal battle, which was an attempt to receive funds from the film "Wall Street 2." The Douglas' divorce settlement reached a few sticking points when they arrived at the issue of dividing marital assets and future royalties from the actor's films.

Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas in the 1980s

However, the divorce was eventually decided, after 23-years of marriage, which is regrettable. In 2010, Douglas did the sequel to the film "Wall Street." Diandra Douglas contested the divorce settlement, as the first film took place during their marriage in the 1980s and as such, she believed she was entitled to money from what became a franchise with the sequel. However, Judge Matthew F. Cooper denied the appeal stating it is a matter for the California courts to decide.

RELATED ARTICLE

Catherine Zeta-Jones Punched In The Face By Paparazzi